All the President’s Senators: Presidential Copartisans and the Allocation of Federal Grants
نویسندگان
چکیده
Previous scholarship argues that House members’ partisan relationship to the president is among the most important determinants of the share of federal dollars they bring home to their constituents. Do presidential politics also shape distributive outcomes in the Senate? Analyzing the allocation of more than $8.5 trillion of federal grants across the states from 1984 to 2008, we show that presidential copartisan senators are more successful than opposition party members in securing federal dollars for their home states. Moreover, presidents appear to target grants ex post to states that gain presidential copartisans in recent elections.
منابع مشابه
Dino P. Christenson
Previous scholarship argues that House members’ partisan relationship to the president is among the most important determinants of the share of federal dollars they bring home to their constituents. Do presidential politics also shape distributive outcomes in the Senate? Analyzing the allocation of more than $8.5 trillion of federal grants across the states from 1984 to 2008, we show that presi...
متن کاملAiding and Abetting the President: Agency Responsiveness to Presidential Electoral Interests
Do presidents use federal agencies as campaign resources? Scholars of distributive politics have long argued that political elites use public policy outcomes for electoral benefit. Of late, researchers have focused more closely on the president’s role in this process. However, little work examines how differences across agencies condition agency responsiveness to presidential electoral preferen...
متن کاملModeling and forecasting US presidential election using learning algorithms
The primary objective of this research is to obtain an accurate forecasting model for the US presidential election. To identify a reliable model, artificial neural networks (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR) models are compared based on some specified performance measures. Moreover, six independent variables such as GDP, unemployment rate, the president’s approval rate, and others are co...
متن کاملWho Gets What? The Importance of Ministerial Budget in the Allocation of Portfolios in Presidential Multiparty Systems
How influential is the president’s advantage in cabinet formation in presidential systems? Do presidents receive more and the most important portfolios? What factors lead to a more or less disproportionate distributions of portfolios? In this study, I suggest answers for these questions through a theory in which the disproportional allocation of portfolios can be explained by the privileged pos...
متن کاملThe Electoral Consequences of Presidential Support
Conventional wisdom suggests that the president’s standing with the public affects his success in Congress. Electoral self-interest is the primary reason to expect a relationship between presidential popularity and the behavior of members of Congress. Although numerous studies have analyzed the effects of presidential popularity, the lack of presidential approval data at the congressional const...
متن کامل